Where two or more separate and distinct offences have been committed and the evidence in support of one offence differs from that in support of any other offence, it will be bad indictment to lump all the offences together in one count. The indictments on the abetment of falsification of accounts in the instant case were not bad for duplicity because each entry in the account books of the company that was false was indictable. The appellants could hardly contend that in the result they were being prejudiced or embarrassed by not having been made to face six counts instead of the one count they faced at the trial. C.O.P. v Sencherey [1959] G.L.R. 255 applied.